Stephen R. Hoff

31 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Stephen R. Hoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Otorhinolaryngology 127
  • Internal Medicine 91
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 21
  • Speech and Hearing 44
  • Sensory Systems 25
Replace John Fish with:
John Fish United States
J. Paul M. Pracy United Kingdom
Garth Essig United States
Emin Karaman Türkiye
C. A. Milford United Kingdom
Charles Raffaelli France
Vladimir Strunski France
J. D. Blanshard United Kingdom
Maria Luisa Fiorella Italy
Murad Husein Canada
Stephen R. Hoff relative to John Fish United States John Fish's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.7×
John Fish · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen R. Hoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen R. Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen R. Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen R. Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen R. Hoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen R. Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen R. Hoff. The network helps show where Stephen R. Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen R. Hoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen R. Hoff Line = papers co-authored together Stephen R. Hoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
RD heparin compared with warfarin for prevention of venous thromboembolic disease following total hip or knee arthroplasty
199498
2 200972
3 201947
4 200642
5 201034
6 201434
7 201734
8 201629
9 200528
10 202020
11 201920
12 202118
13 202117
14 198115
15 201514
16 202013
17 201712
18 201811
19 201711
20 201411

About Stephen R. Hoff

Stephen R. Hoff is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Speech and Hearing and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (8 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (2 papers) and Teratomas and Epidermoid Cysts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (127 citations), Internal Medicine (91 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (21 citations), Speech and Hearing (44 citations) and Sensory Systems (25 citations). Stephen R. Hoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lauren D. Holinger, James W. Schroeder, Jeff C. Rastatter, Jeffrey C. Rastatter, Nancy M. Young, John Mark Carter, Saied Ghadersohi, Kathleen R. Billings, Maura E. Ryan and Gresham Thomas Richter. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Otology & Neurotology, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact