Stephen R. Hoff

28 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Stephen R. Hoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Otorhinolaryngology 122
  • Internal Medicine 87
  • Speech and Hearing 86
  • Sensory Systems 40
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 18
Replace A. Tomkinson with:
A. Tomkinson United Kingdom
G. E. Murty United Kingdom
Ramon Gordon Jensen Denmark
Leo G. McClymont United Kingdom
D. Meikle United Kingdom
Matthew E. Smith United Kingdom
Vasileios A. Lachanas Greece
A. Karkanevatos United Kingdom
Mohammad Faramarzi Iran
Michael Haupert United States
Stephen R. Hoff relative to A. Tomkinson United Kingdom A. Tomkinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
A. Tomkinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen R. Hoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen R. Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen R. Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen R. Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen R. Hoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen R. Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen R. Hoff. The network helps show where Stephen R. Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen R. Hoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen R. Hoff Line = papers co-authored together Stephen R. Hoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
RD heparin compared with warfarin for prevention of venous thromboembolic disease following total hip or knee arthroplasty
199489
2 200965
3 200638
4 201938
5 201732
6 201031
7 201428
8 201626
9 200524
10 202020
11 202117
12 202115
13 201514
14 201711
15 201711
16 201411
17 201811
18 20208
19 19818
20 20137

About Stephen R. Hoff

Stephen R. Hoff is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology, Genetics and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tracheal and airway disorders (9 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (8 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (4 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (3 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (3 papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (122 citations), Internal Medicine (87 citations), Speech and Hearing (86 citations), Sensory Systems (40 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (18 citations). Stephen R. Hoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lauren D. Holinger, James W. Schroeder, Jeff C. Rastatter, Jeffrey C. Rastatter, John M. Carter, Nancy M. Young, Kathleen R. Billings, Maura E. Ryan, Carolyn M. Jenks and Gresham T. Richter. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, Otology & Neurotology and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact