Stephen Poon
Impact in
- Oncology top 5%
- Clusterin in disease pathology
- Physiology top 5%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Papers in
- Oncology 11
- Clusterin in disease pathology 9
-
- Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions 7
- Co-authors
- Mark R. Wilson (10 shared papers)Kenneth L. Johnson (1 shared paper)J. A. Greenwood (1 shared paper)John A. Carver (5 shared papers)Justin J. Yerbury (5 shared papers)Simon B. Easterbrook‐Smith (4 shared papers)Christopher M. Dobson (4 shared papers)Mark S. Rybchyn (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Wear (3 papers)Biochemistry (3 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)The FASEB Journal (1 paper)Tribology International (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Poon
25 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Oncology 633
- Physiology 380
- Mechanics of Materials 328
- Mechanical Engineering 449
- Molecular Biology 785
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Poon
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Poon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Poon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Poon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Poon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Poon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Poon. The network helps show where Stephen Poon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Poon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1972 | 353 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 258 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 211 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 117 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 114 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 99 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 91 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 85 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 78 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 73 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 63 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 58 | |
| 13 | 1972 | 46 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 35 | |
| 15 | 1966 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1967 | 10 |
About Stephen Poon
Stephen Poon is a scholar working on Oncology, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Computational Mechanics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clusterin in disease pathology (9 papers), Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis (8 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (7 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (7 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (2 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Heat shock proteins research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (633 citations), Physiology (380 citations), Mechanics of Materials (328 citations), Mechanical Engineering (449 citations) and Molecular Biology (785 citations). Stephen Poon has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark R. Wilson, Kenneth L. Johnson, J. A. Greenwood, John A. Carver, Justin J. Yerbury, Simon B. Easterbrook‐Smith, Christopher M. Dobson, Mark S. Rybchyn, Janet R. Kumita and Sarah Meehan. Their work appears in journals such as Wear, Biochemistry, Journal of Biological Chemistry, The FASEB Journal and Tribology International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.