Stephen P. Joy

893 citations
22 papers · 622 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen P. Joy

21 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Stephen P. Joy
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 168
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 179
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 120
  • Conservation 22
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 31
Replace Robyn Flaum Cruz with:
Robyn Flaum Cruz United States
Marianne L. Simmel United States
Matthew E. Sachs United States
T. W. Allen United States
Chiara S. Haller United States
Kari M. Eddington United States
Christophe de Bézenac United Kingdom
Orrie Dan Israel
Uwe Altmann Germany
Jonathan Jackson United States
Stephen P. Joy relative to Robyn Flaum Cruz United States Robyn Flaum Cruz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Robyn Flaum Cruz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen P. Joy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen P. Joy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen P. Joy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen P. Joy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen P. Joy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen P. Joy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen P. Joy. The network helps show where Stephen P. Joy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Stephen P. Joy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen P. Joy Line = papers co-authored together Stephen P. Joy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004212
2 200399
3 200055
4 200654
5 200430
6 200322
7 201521
8 201021
9 200818
10 200117
11 200512
12 200412
13 199011
14 20049
15 20127
16 20016
17 19995
18 20124
19 20173
20 20092

About Stephen P. Joy

Stephen P. Joy is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Psychiatry and Mental health and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (9 papers), Art Education and Development (7 papers), Design Education and Practice (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (168 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (179 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations), Conservation (22 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (31 citations). Stephen P. Joy has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Fein, Edith Kaplan, Morris Freedman, Donna H. Kaiser, Rachel Yehuda, William S. Edell and E. Kaplan. Their work appears in journals such as Creativity Research Journal, The Journal of Creative Behavior, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, The Clinical Neuropsychologist and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact