Stephen Nathanson

593 citations
36 papers · 200 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • War, Ethics, and Justification
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

Papers in

Stephen Nathanson

28 papers receiving 155 citations

Peers

Stephen Nathanson
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Philosophy 58
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Political Science and International Relations 73
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
  • Law 23
Replace Robert Ginsberg with:
Robert Ginsberg United States
Richard Marius United States
Franklin Hugh Adler United States
Ellsworth R. Fuhrman United States
Helmut Dubiel Germany
JoAnn Chirico United States
Dick Howard United States
Jean Radford
Herman Paul Netherlands
James D. Bratt United States
Stephen Nathanson relative to Robert Ginsberg United States Robert Ginsberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert Ginsberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Nathanson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Nathanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Nathanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Nathanson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Nathanson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Nathanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Nathanson. The network helps show where Stephen Nathanson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Nathanson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Nathanson Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Nathanson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198962
2 198319
3 201019
4 197610
5
Developing Legal Problem-Solving Skills.
19948
6 19828
7 19997
8
Designing Problems to Teach Legal Problem Solving
19986
9 20096
10 20175
11
The Role of Problem Solving in Legal Education.
19895
12 20175
13
An Eye for an Eye?: The Immorality of Punishing by Death
19875
14 20134
15 20124
16 19934
17 19984
18 19963
19 20163
20 19962

About Stephen Nathanson

Stephen Nathanson is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Oncology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (7 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Legal Issues in Education (2 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (58 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Political Science and International Relations (73 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations) and Law (23 citations). Stephen Nathanson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and France. Frequent co-authors include A Bensman, Georges Deschênes, A. Greder Belan, E. Mahé, Cz. Woźniak, M.-A. Dommergues, Véronique Hentgen, P. Foucaud, M.‐L. Sigal and C. Bertin. Their work appears in journals such as Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, Journal of legal education, Journal of Social Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Utilitas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact