Stephen Moore

866 citations
23 papers · 680 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Moore

23 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Stephen Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Parasitology 204
  • Equine 27
  • Infectious Diseases 163
  • Ophthalmology 71
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 80
Replace Nedim C. Buyukmihci with:
Nedim C. Buyukmihci United States
Igal Horowitz Israel
Arianne Pontes Oriá Brazil
Noha Abou‐Madi United States
Eva Martínez‐Nevado Spain
Simon J. Girling United Kingdom
Yoichi Inoue Japan
Sathya K. Chinnadurai United States
Juliet R. Gionfriddo United States
Grant Thornton
Stephen Moore relative to Nedim C. Buyukmihci United States Nedim C. Buyukmihci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Nedim C. Buyukmihci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Moore. The network helps show where Stephen Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Moore Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000147
2 2016102
3 201483
4 199974
5 201056
6 199454
7 201027
8 200727
9 199917
10
Technical Report: Update on Lyme Disease Prevention and Control
201215
11 201413
12 201812
13 202111
14 20079
15 20198
16 20167
17
Wagner in Ireland: An Econometric Analysis
20165
18 20194
19 20143
20 20222

About Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Parasitology, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (4 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (2 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (204 citations), Equine (27 citations), Infectious Diseases (163 citations), Ophthalmology (71 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (80 citations). Stephen Moore has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alison M. Harman, R.V. Hoskins, Brett S. Abrahams, Curtis Russell, Samir N. Patel, Mark P. Nelder, Ye Li, Steven Ross Johnson, P. Keller and Doug Sider. Their work appears in journals such as Zoonoses and Public Health, Brain Research, BMC Public Health, The Anatomical Record and Parasites & Vectors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact