Stephen McWilliams

862 citations
31 papers · 641 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen McWilliams

30 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers

Stephen McWilliams
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 339
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Clinical Psychology 155
  • Philosophy 55
  • Social Psychology 87
Replace Larkin Feeney with:
Larkin Feeney Ireland
Pichet Udomratn Thailand
Ola Granström Sweden
Vijayalakshmy Patrick United States
Corrine Cather United States
Chris Gilmore United Kingdom
Hans Rittmannsberger Austria
Graham M.L. Eglit United States
Celso Iglesias García Spain
Javier-David López-Moríñigo Spain
Stephen McWilliams relative to Larkin Feeney Ireland Larkin Feeney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Larkin Feeney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen McWilliams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen McWilliams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen McWilliams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen McWilliams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen McWilliams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen McWilliams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen McWilliams. The network helps show where Stephen McWilliams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen McWilliams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen McWilliams Line = papers co-authored together Stephen McWilliams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201797
2 200993
3 201542
4 202137
5 201432
6 200931
7 200830
8 201227
9 201225
10 200722
11 200820
12 202220
13 202119
14 202017
15 201116
16 200816
17 200913
18 201213
19 200712
20 201012

About Stephen McWilliams

Stephen McWilliams is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (13 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Global Health Care Issues (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (339 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations), Philosophy (55 citations) and Social Psychology (87 citations). Stephen McWilliams has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Kinsella, Eadbhard O’Callaghan, Dolores Keating, Caroline Hynes, Niall Turner, Mary Clarke, Laoise Renwick, Deirdre Jackson, Judith Strawbridge and Caragh Behan. Their work appears in journals such as Early Intervention in Psychiatry, BMJ Open, European Psychiatry, International Journal of Biometeorology and Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact