Stephen Lacey

38 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Stephen Lacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 106
  • Rehabilitation 60
  • Marketing 66
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 29
  • Literature and Literary Theory 63
Replace Douglas Cameron with:
Douglas Cameron United Kingdom
Carol King United States
Yuexin Wang United States
Tianjun Sun United States
Rachel Lee-Yin Tan Singapore
Ross Atkinson United Kingdom
Patricia Puerta Spain
Elizabeth Buckley Australia
Robert Harris United States
M Solomon United States
Stephen Lacey relative to Douglas Cameron United Kingdom Douglas Cameron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×
Douglas Cameron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lacey. The network helps show where Stephen Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Lacey Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Lacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009149
2 199566
3 198653
4 196946
5 199140
6
Popular television drama: critical perspectives
200527
7 201726
8 198724
9 199821
10
British Television Drama: Past, Present and Future
200021
11
A fast, easy sort
199118
12 198718
13 199318
14 199818
15 199617
16 198517
17 200616
18 197315
19 199911
20 20188

About Stephen Lacey

Stephen Lacey is a scholar working on Surgery, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 50 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (9 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (2 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (106 citations), Rehabilitation (60 citations), Marketing (66 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (63 citations). Stephen Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elton Li, Johan Bruwer, Michael W. Keith, Jonathan Bignell, John W. Shaffer, G. E. Bentley, Alvin A. Freehafer, R. Geoffrey Wilber, P. Hunter Peckham and Richard C. Box. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal Of Hand Surgery, Critical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies, New Theatre Quarterly, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Cinema Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact