Stephen Lacey

35 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Stephen Lacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 102
  • Rehabilitation 56
  • Marketing 64
  • Surgery 176
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 19
Replace Carol King with:
Carol King United States
Susan McDonald United States
Elizabeth Buckley Australia
Ross Atkinson United Kingdom
Pankaj Aggarwal India
Sarah Campos Canada
Kapil Jain India
Amy Burns United Kingdom
Zahra Akbari Iran
Muhammad Nazim United States
Stephen Lacey relative to Carol King United States Carol King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
Carol King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lacey. The network helps show where Stephen Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Lacey Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Lacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009143
2 199563
3 198648
4 199137
5 201726
6 196924
7
Popular television drama: critical perspectives
200523
8 198721
9 199617
10 199817
11 198517
12 199816
13
A fast, easy sort
199115
14 197315
15 199315
16
British Television Drama: Past, Present and Future
200015
17 200614
18 198714
19 20188
20 19997

About Stephen Lacey

Stephen Lacey is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Economics and Econometrics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 44 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (7 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (102 citations), Rehabilitation (56 citations), Marketing (64 citations), Surgery (176 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (19 citations). Stephen Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Johan Bruwer, Elton Li, Michael W. Keith, John W. Shaffer, Jonathan Bignell, Alvin A. Freehafer, R. Geoffrey Wilber, G. E. Bentley, P. Hunter Peckham and Richard C. Box. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal Of Hand Surgery, Critical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies, New Theatre Quarterly, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact