Stephen King

2.5k citations
125 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen King

106 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Stephen King
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Media Technology 468
  • Strategy and Management 786
  • Marketing 421
  • Economics and Econometrics 554
  • Management Science and Operations Research 188
Replace Ulrich Kaiser with:
Ulrich Kaiser Germany
Junseok Hwang South Korea
Ingo Vogelsang United States
Benjamin B. M. Shao United States
Luca Lambertini Italy
Uday Apte United States
Erik Brynjolfsson United States
Maxwell Chipulu United Kingdom
Erik Bohlin Sweden
Ewa Ziemba Poland
Stephen King relative to Ulrich Kaiser Germany Ulrich Kaiser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ulrich Kaiser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen King. The network helps show where Stephen King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen King Line = papers co-authored together Stephen King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017137
2 1997107
3 2003103
4 200194
5 199979
6 201676
7 200669
8 200066
9 200446
10 200244
11 200131
12 199629
13 200028
14 199928
15 199827
16 200326
17 200324
18 199923
19 200122
20 200421

About Stephen King

Stephen King is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Media Technology, Management Science and Operations Research and Marketing, having authored 125 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Platforms and Economics (34 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (31 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (27 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (12 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (10 papers), Game Theory and Applications (9 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers) and Economic theories and models (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (468 citations), Strategy and Management (786 citations), Marketing (421 citations), Economics and Econometrics (554 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (188 citations). Stephen King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joshua S. Gans, Chongwoo Choe, Noriaki Matsushima, Simon Grant, Ryan Lampe, Maxim Engers, Russell Smyth, Zhiming Cheng, Haining Wang and Rohan Pitchford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Economics, Information Economics and Policy, International Journal of Industrial Organization, The Aeronautical Journal and Economics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact