Stephen Kahn
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Papers in
-
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 5
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 2
- Co-authors
- Salvatore R. Maddi (2 shared papers)Suzanne C. Kobasa (1 shared paper)Teresa M. Amabile (1 shared paper)Erika Fromm (4 shared papers)Mihály Csíkszentmihályi (1 shared paper)J. W. Getzels (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (3 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1 paper)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis (1 paper)Consulting psychology journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Kahn
10 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Stephen Kahn's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Applied Psychology 254
- Clinical Psychology 863
- Social Psychology 521
- General Health Professions 488
- Leadership and Management 19
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Kahn
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Kahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Kahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Kahn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Kahn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Kahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Kahn. The network helps show where Stephen Kahn may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Kahn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hardiness and health: A prospective study. Hit paper breakdown → | 1982 | 1368 |
| 2 | 1998 | 137 | |
| 3 | 1984 | 75 | |
| 4 | Self-Hypnosis: The Chicago Paradigm | 1990 | 14 |
| 5 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 1 |
About Stephen Kahn
Stephen Kahn is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (254 citations), Clinical Psychology (863 citations), Social Psychology (521 citations), General Health Professions (488 citations) and Leadership and Management (19 citations). Stephen Kahn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Salvatore R. Maddi, Suzanne C. Kobasa, Teresa M. Amabile, Erika Fromm, Mihály Csíkszentmihályi and J. W. Getzels. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis and Consulting psychology journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.