Stephen J. Willson

50 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Stephen J. Willson
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Mathematical Physics 214
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 290
  • Paleontology 67
  • Algebra and Number Theory 28
  • Geometry and Topology 47
Replace Michael Fuchs with:
Michael Fuchs Taiwan
Hugo Steinhaus Poland
Louigi Addario‐Berry Canada
Charles H. C. Little New Zealand
Marta Casanellas Spain
Dean A. Neumann United States
David Uminsky United States
Christian M. Reidys United States
Radu Mihaescu United States
Stéphane Attal France
Stephen J. Willson relative to Michael Fuchs Taiwan Michael Fuchs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Michael Fuchs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Willson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Willson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Willson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Willson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Willson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Willson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Willson. The network helps show where Stephen J. Willson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Willson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen J. Willson Line = papers co-authored together Stephen J. Willson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198476
2 200663
3 198743
4 198434
5 198733
6 197527
7 200926
8 200524
9 201022
10 199822
11 199921
12 197521
13 199319
14 201218
15 197518
16 197817
17 199817
18 197517
19 199216
20 200416

About Stephen J. Willson

Stephen J. Willson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetics, Mathematical Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (19 papers), Cellular Automata and Applications (12 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (7 papers), Genome Rearrangement Algorithms (6 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (5 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (214 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (290 citations), Paleontology (67 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (28 citations) and Geometry and Topology (47 citations). Stephen J. Willson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Ashlock, Steven Corns, Kenneth M. Bryden, N. Leahy, Dan Ashlock, M. K. Misra, Daniel Moos, Suranjan Panigrahi, Rubén Prieto-Díaz and Christopher D. Barton. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Discrete Applied Mathematics, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena and Pacific Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact