Stephen J. Tonsor

42 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Stephen J. Tonsor
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 655
  • Ecological Modeling 171
  • Genetics 913
  • Plant Science 951
Replace Irène Till‐Bottraud with:
Irène Till‐Bottraud France
Diane R. Elam United States
Steven J. Brunsfeld United States
Marie‐Charlotte Anstett France
Birgit Ziegenhagen Germany
Nobuhiro Tomaru Japan
Hélène Fréville France
Itziar Aguinagalde Spain
Robert G. Latta Canada
Tom A. Ranker United States
Stephen J. Tonsor relative to Irène Till‐Bottraud France Irène Till‐Bottraud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Irène Till‐Bottraud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Tonsor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Tonsor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Tonsor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Tonsor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Tonsor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Tonsor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Tonsor. The network helps show where Stephen J. Tonsor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Tonsor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen J. Tonsor Line = papers co-authored together Stephen J. Tonsor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995372
2 2001179
3 1993134
4 1999132
5 2010126
6 200498
7 201989
8 200981
9 200977
10 201376
11 201272
12 198969
13 201368
14 198164
15 200762
16 200860
17 200756
18 198551
19 200948
20 199340

About Stephen J. Tonsor

Stephen J. Tonsor is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (7 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (4 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (655 citations), Ecological Modeling (171 citations), Genetics (913 citations) and Plant Science (951 citations). Stephen J. Tonsor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Susan Kalisz, Francisco B.‐G. Moore, Patrick C. Phillips, Michael C. Whitlock, Frances M. Hanzawa, Alicia Montesinos‐Navarro, F. Xavier Picó, Samuel M. Scheiner, Carlos Alonso‐Blanco and John D. Nason. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution, The American Naturalist, Oecologia, Journal of the History of Ideas and American Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact