Stephen Heath

4.0k citations
70 papers · 2.6k · 1 hit paper · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Heath

52 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Stephen Heath's Hit Papers

Image-Music-Text 1977 · 2.0k citations
2.0k0+16+32Years since publication50010001.5k2.0k

Peers

Stephen Heath
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 426
  • Literature and Literary Theory 884
  • Music 190
  • Communication 230
  • Philosophy 335
Replace David William Foster with:
David William Foster United States
Dana Polan United States
Seymour Chatman United States
Alice Jardine
Linda Hutcheon Canada
Hans Robert Jauß Canada
Toril Moi United States
Cathy N. Davidson United States
Mieke Bal Netherlands
Michael Pickering United Kingdom
Stephen Heath relative to David William Foster United States David William Foster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
David William Foster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Heath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Heath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Heath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Heath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Heath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Heath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Heath. The network helps show where Stephen Heath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Heath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Heath Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Heath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Image-Music-Text
Hit paper breakdown →
19772036
2 1981132
3 198289
4 198964
5 198152
6 198224
7 200524
8 197720
9 200015
10 198614
11 197512
12 20109
13 19827
14
The nouveau roman
19726
15
Prefaces to Shakespeare
20106
16 19976
17 19835
18 19765
19 19815
20 19995

About Stephen Heath

Stephen Heath is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics, Philosophy, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (12 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (3 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (3 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (426 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (884 citations), Music (190 citations), Communication (230 citations) and Philosophy (335 citations). Stephen Heath has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Roland Barthes, Joan Copjec, Teresa de Lauretis, Colin MacCabe, Gordon Graham, Bruce Morrissette, Dario M. Frigo, Noël Carroll, Denise Riley and Tony Tanner. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Quarterly, October, SubStance, The Modern Language Review and NOVEL A Forum on Fiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact