Stephen Hanley

23 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Stephen Hanley
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 163
  • Surgery 373
  • Genetics 176
  • Gastroenterology 22
  • Pharmacology 33
Replace Erling Tjora with:
Erling Tjora Norway
Carlo Socci Italy
Jan Henrik Storkholm Denmark
Jun‐Long Song China
Kathy Liu United States
Sabrina Guerra Italy
Toshiya Sawada Japan
Christophe Ravaud France
Nasser Abualhassan Canada
E Montaña Spain
Stephen Hanley relative to Erling Tjora Norway Erling Tjora's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Erling Tjora · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hanley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hanley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hanley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hanley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hanley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hanley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hanley. The network helps show where Stephen Hanley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hanley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hanley Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hanley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010125
2 200567
3 200858
4 200635
5 200631
6 201126
7 201824
8 201523
9 200723
10 200722
11 201117
12 200814
13 200810
14 20077
15 20116
16 20236
17 20155
18 20215
19 20093
20 20172

About Stephen Hanley

Stephen Hanley is a scholar working on Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (13 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (7 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (6 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (4 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers) and Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (163 citations), Surgery (373 citations), Genetics (176 citations), Gastroenterology (22 citations) and Pharmacology (33 citations). Stephen Hanley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence Rosenberg, Mark Lipsett, Steven Paraskevas, Emily Austin, Maria Petropavlovskaia, Lynn Rosenberg, Jason Blaichman, Mauro Castellarin, Robert Sladek and Lorenzo Ferri. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Transplantation, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Diabetologia and The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact