Dan Deckelbaum

2.2k citations
83 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Deckelbaum

77 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Dan Deckelbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Emergency Medicine 361
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 74
  • Emergency Medical Services 93
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 225
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 25
Replace Tarek Razek with:
Tarek Razek Canada
Paola Fata Canada
Areg Grigorian United States
Paul T. Engels Canada
Brandon Bruns United States
Michael S. Truitt United States
Michael Ries United States
Hugh M. Foy United States
Andreas Böhn Germany
C. Beth Sise United States
Dan Deckelbaum relative to Tarek Razek Canada Tarek Razek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tarek Razek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Deckelbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Deckelbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Deckelbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Deckelbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Deckelbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Deckelbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Deckelbaum. The network helps show where Dan Deckelbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan Deckelbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Deckelbaum Line = papers co-authored together Dan Deckelbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011114
2 201581
3 201680
4 200872
5 201466
6 201355
7 201451
8 201550
9 201444
10 201737
11 201934
12 201724
13 201724
14 201322
15 201917
16 201516
17 201416
18 201416
19 201616
20 201115

About Dan Deckelbaum

Dan Deckelbaum is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (21 papers), Global Health and Surgery (13 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (4 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (361 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (74 citations), Emergency Medical Services (93 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (225 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (25 citations). Dan Deckelbaum has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Rwanda. Frequent co-authors include Tarek Razek, Kosar Khwaja, Paola Fata, Liane S. Feldman, Evan G. Wong, Adam L. Kushner, Etienne St‐Louis, Monisha Sudarshan, Shailvi Gupta and Jeremy Grushka. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Surgery, World Journal of Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Surgery and Annals of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact