Stephen H. Roxburgh

7.3k citations
110 papers · 4.1k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen H. Roxburgh

108 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Stephen H. Roxburgh
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 410
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.8k
  • Ecology 1.4k
  • Forestry 206
Replace Flávio Jorge Ponzoni with:
Flávio Jorge Ponzoni Brazil
Balázs Déak Hungary
Μαργαρίτα Αριανούτσου Greece
Ghislain Vieilledent France
R. Flint Hughes United States
Michiel van Breugel Panama
Zhanqing Hao China
Carlos Augusto Klink Brazil
Viki A. Cramer Australia
Jonathan D. Bakker United States
Stephen H. Roxburgh relative to Flávio Jorge Ponzoni Brazil Flávio Jorge Ponzoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Flávio Jorge Ponzoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Roxburgh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Roxburgh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Roxburgh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Roxburgh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen H. Roxburgh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Roxburgh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Roxburgh. The network helps show where Stephen H. Roxburgh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen H. Roxburgh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen H. Roxburgh Line = papers co-authored together Stephen H. Roxburgh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004471
2 2008386
3 2004367
4 2011184
5 2013109
6 2006106
7 2013105
8 1994104
9 201593
10 200584
11 201581
12 199860
13 202059
14 201257
15 201256
16 201353
17 201452
18 200448
19 200547
20 201445

About Stephen H. Roxburgh

Stephen H. Roxburgh is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Environmental Engineering, having authored 110 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (41 papers), Forest ecology and management (29 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (27 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (20 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers), Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (13 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (410 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.8k citations), Ecology (1.4k citations) and Forestry (206 citations). Stephen H. Roxburgh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Katriona Shea, J. B. Wilson, Karel Mokany, Julian Ash, J. Bastow Wilson, Emily S. J. Rauschert, Keryn I. Paul, Adam D. Miller, Jacqueline R. England and Brendan Mackey. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Oikos, Journal of Vegetation Science, Environmental Modelling & Software and International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact