Stephen G. Eick

68 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Stephen G. Eick
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.1k
  • Management Information Systems 257
  • Information Systems 364
  • Software 70
  • Statistics and Probability 159
Replace Diane Tang with:
Diane Tang United States
Frederick H. Lochovsky Hong Kong
Mao Lin Huang Australia
Gültekin Özsoyoğlu United States
Aleksandra Mojsilović United States
Michael S. Marshall Netherlands
Mohand-Saïd Hacid France
Stavros Christodoulakis Greece
Jan H. P. Eloff South Africa
Carey L. Williamson Canada
Stephen G. Eick relative to Diane Tang United States Diane Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Diane Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen G. Eick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen G. Eick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen G. Eick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen G. Eick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen G. Eick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen G. Eick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen G. Eick. The network helps show where Stephen G. Eick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen G. Eick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen G. Eick Line = papers co-authored together Stephen G. Eick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995316
2 1993187
3 1995141
4 1993136
5 1992127
6 199393
7 199790
8 199888
9 199485
10 200266
11 199565
12 199665
13 199861
14 199558
15 199453
16 199750
17 200050
18 199343
19 199538
20 200138

About Stephen G. Eick

Stephen G. Eick is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Software and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (55 papers), Software Engineering Research (5 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (2 papers), Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research (2 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (1 paper), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (1 paper) and Big Data and Business Intelligence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.1k citations), Management Information Systems (257 citations), Information Systems (364 citations), Software (70 citations) and Statistics and Probability (159 citations). Stephen G. Eick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Allan R. Wilks, William A. Massey, Ward Whitt, Graham J. Wills, Nahum D. Gershon, Donald A. Berry, Kenneth C. Cox, Mei C. Chuah, Alan F. Karr and Stuart K. Card. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Information Visualization, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and Communications of the ACM.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact