Stephen Folger

742 citations
14 papers · 552 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Folger

13 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Stephen Folger
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 412
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 105
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 58
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 52
Replace Kazuo Kuroiwa with:
Kazuo Kuroiwa Japan
C. Ervin Davis United States
Tamaki Miyamoto Japan
Frank Marzinzik Germany
Francis McGlone United Kingdom
Benoı̂t Bolmont France
Marie-Noële Magnié-Mauro France
Arihiro Hatta Japan
Ikuko Sato‐Suzuki Japan
Afra Wohlschläeger Germany
Stephen Folger relative to Kazuo Kuroiwa Japan Kazuo Kuroiwa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Kazuo Kuroiwa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Folger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Folger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Folger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Folger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Folger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Folger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Folger. The network helps show where Stephen Folger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Folger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Folger Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Folger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007279
2
Changes in EEG during graded exercise on a recumbent cycle ergometer.
200895
3 201036
4 199731
5 199926
6 200824
7 201417
8 200816
9 201912
10 199610
11 20142
12 20062
13 20191
14 20041

About Stephen Folger

Stephen Folger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Neurology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (412 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (27 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (105 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (58 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (52 citations). Stephen Folger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Francis McGlone, Gregory Essick, Vinay Tannan, Carissa J. Cascio, Grace T. Baranek, Kevin A. Pelphrey, Stephen P. Bailey, Edward F. Kelly, Eric E. Hall and Paul Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Journal of Pain, Brain Research, Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact