Stephen Elliot

578 citations
7 papers · 25 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Elliot

6 papers receiving 25 citations

Peers

Stephen Elliot
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 6
  • Signal Processing 3
  • Biomedical Engineering 12
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2
  • Media Technology 2
Replace Ahmad Abdul Karim with:
Ahmad Abdul Karim France
Hamed Y. Mesri Australia
A. Ivanovs Switzerland
Ali Tazarv United States
N. Bautista-Elivar Mexico
Akash Velu United States
Amir Mehdi Shayan United States
G. H. Hong South Korea
Xinzhe Luo China
H. S. Chen China
Stephen Elliot relative to Ahmad Abdul Karim France Ahmad Abdul Karim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ahmad Abdul Karim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Elliot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Elliot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Elliot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Elliot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Elliot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Elliot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Elliot. The network helps show where Stephen Elliot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Elliot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Elliot Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Elliot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 201012
2
Effects of illumination changes on the performance of geometrix FaceVision® 3D FRS
20044
3 19934
4 20223
5
Effects of template aging on facial recognition
20041
6
A Conversation Over Tea: Stumbling and Raging: More Politically Inspired Fiction
20051
7
The effects of varying illumination levels on FRS algorithm performance
20040

About Stephen Elliot

Stephen Elliot is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 25 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biometric Identification and Security (3 papers), Face recognition and analysis (3 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (6 citations), Signal Processing (3 citations), Biomedical Engineering (12 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (2 citations) and Media Technology (2 citations). Stephen Elliot has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert P. Velthuizen, A. Dingizian, F. Zanow, Timothy Mastroianni, Robert LeMoyne, Laurence P. Clarke, David W. Richards, James R. Janesick, Antonia Thelen and Jens Haueisen. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact