Stephen Edward Rees

167 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Stephen Edward Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 323
  • Nephrology 343
  • Emergency Medicine 368
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.2k
Replace Paul J. Feustel with:
Paul J. Feustel United States
Lennart Persson Sweden
Roger A. Johns United States
Ralf Lichtinghagen Germany
Naoki Yahagi Japan
Anders Waldenström Sweden
Mark S. Wainwright United States
Tomoko Fujii Japan
M. Gary Nicholls New Zealand
Robert L. Engler United States
Stephen Edward Rees relative to Paul J. Feustel United States Paul J. Feustel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Paul J. Feustel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Edward Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Edward Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Edward Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Edward Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Edward Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Edward Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Edward Rees. The network helps show where Stephen Edward Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Edward Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Edward Rees Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Edward Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002281
2 1996255
3 2001198
4 2002171
5 2004155
6 2007120
7 2012115
8 1996100
9 199497
10 199886
11 199679
12 200672
13 200771
14 199771
15 199965
16 200259
17 200356
18 199956
19 199855
20 200155

About Stephen Edward Rees

Stephen Edward Rees is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Nephrology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 177 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (74 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (46 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (33 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (27 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (20 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (20 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (15 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (323 citations), Nephrology (343 citations), Emergency Medicine (368 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k citations). Stephen Edward Rees has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alan Wise, Steen Andreassen, Graeme Milligan, Dan Stieper Karbing, Søren Kjærgaard, Douglas Ramsay, Elaine Kellett, Mary McVey, Melanie Lee and S.J. Goodson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Journal of Critical Care, Molecular Pharmacology and FEBS Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact