Stephen E. Schauer
Impact in
- Plant Science top 2%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- RNA Research and Splicing
Papers in
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 7
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 2
- Plant Virus Research Studies 1
-
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 2
- Co-authors
- Animesh Ray (4 shared papers)David W. Meinke (2 shared papers)Steven E. Jacobsen (1 shared paper)Michael Florian Mette (1 shared paper)Werner Aufsatz (1 shared paper)I. Papp (1 shared paper)Lucia Daxinger (1 shared paper)Antonius J. M. Matzke (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Developmental Biology (2 papers)PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (2 papers)The Plant Cell (1 paper)Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stephen E. Schauer
11 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Plant Science 886
- Molecular Biology 278
- Cancer Research 56
- Cell Biology 45
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Schauer
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Schauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Schauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Schauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Schauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Schauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Schauer. The network helps show where Stephen E. Schauer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Schauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 410 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 285 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 147 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 69 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 10 | Differential response of tumor cell lines to inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint regulator and mitotic kinesin, CENP-E | 2007 | 3 |
| 11 | 2008 | 3 |
About Stephen E. Schauer
Stephen E. Schauer is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (7 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (2 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (1 paper) and Plant Virus Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (886 citations), Molecular Biology (278 citations), Cancer Research (56 citations), Cell Biology (45 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (22 citations). Stephen E. Schauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Animesh Ray, David W. Meinke, Steven E. Jacobsen, Michael Florian Mette, Werner Aufsatz, I. Papp, Lucia Daxinger, Antonius J. M. Matzke, Johannes van der Winden and Marjori A Matzke. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Biology, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, The Plant Cell, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.