Stephen E. Potter

43 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Automotive Engineering 81
  • Applied Psychology 25
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 40
  • Transportation 33
Replace Gnanabarathy Kumaraparathy Bharathy with:
Gnanabarathy Kumaraparathy Bharathy Australia
Shizhen Jia United States
Lea Hennala Finland
Jilles Smids Netherlands
Hao-Yu Zhu China
Ali Alkhatib United States
Ján Huňady Slovakia
Young-Ju Park South Korea
Stephen E. Potter relative to Gnanabarathy Kumaraparathy Bharathy Australia Gnanabarathy Kumaraparathy Bharathy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Gnanabarathy Kumaraparathy Bharathy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Potter. The network helps show where Stephen E. Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Potter Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202091
2 201490
3 201969
4 202261
5 201842
6 197638
7 199330
8 200327
9 198218
10 201017
11 197016
12 201416
13
The case for green fiscal reform: final report of the UK Green Fiscal Commission
200910
14 20129
15 20189
16 20219
17 19739
18 20228
19 20018
20 19867

About Stephen E. Potter

Stephen E. Potter is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Physiology and Rehabilitation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transportation and Mobility Innovations (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (2 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (2 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (2 papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (2 papers) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (11 citations), Automotive Engineering (81 citations), Applied Psychology (25 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (40 citations) and Transportation (33 citations). Stephen E. Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include John Miles, Mark Hawley, Eva Kipnis, Stevienna de Saille, Anthony Grimes, Fraser McLeay, Sarah Kate Smith, Arlene J. Astell, Mansur J. Darlington and Pravir K. Chawdhry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medical Internet Research, The Economic Journal, Journal of Applied Physiology and Research in Transportation Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact