Stephen E. Mercer

2.5k citations
52 papers · 1.9k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 4
    • Signaling Pathways in Disease 4
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 3
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 4

Stephen E. Mercer

51 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Stephen E. Mercer
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Dermatology 143
  • Oncology 425
  • Molecular Biology 882
  • Cell Biology 158
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 146
Replace Elena Rivera with:
Elena Rivera Argentina
Jesús Espada Spain
Gunnar Houge Norway
Carolyn A. Foster Austria
Isao Yuasa Japan
B. Ramanath Rao Netherlands
Weiguang Mao United States
Águeda M. Tejera Spain
Anja Steffen Germany
Roberta Mannucci Italy
Stephen E. Mercer relative to Elena Rivera Argentina Elena Rivera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Elena Rivera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Mercer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Mercer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Mercer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Mercer. The network helps show where Stephen E. Mercer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Mercer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Mercer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018215
2 2002199
3 2010125
4 2004122
5 2004107
6 200583
7 200678
8 202168
9 200967
10 200464
11 200659
12 200654
13 201349
14 200646
15 201642
16 202241
17 200640
18 197335
19 201234
20 198327

About Stephen E. Mercer

Stephen E. Mercer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (4 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (4 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (143 citations), Oncology (425 citations), Molecular Biology (882 citations), Cell Biology (158 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (146 citations). Stephen E. Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eileen Friedman, Daina Z. Ewton, Xiaobing Deng, Robert Phelps, Valerie R. Yanofsky, Kideok Jin, Zhongfa Yan, Mark L. Burleson, Richard E. Olson and Yonglong Zou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, Tetrahedron Letters and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact