Stephen E. Mercer

2.4k citations
51 papers · 1.8k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

    • Signaling Pathways in Disease 4
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 4
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 3
    • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 4

Stephen E. Mercer

50 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Stephen E. Mercer
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Oncology 428
  • Dermatology 137
  • Molecular Biology 886
  • Cell Biology 154
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 155
Replace Elena Rivera with:
Elena Rivera Argentina
Carolyn A. Foster Austria
R Joseph United States
Hiroko Masuda Japan
Gunnar Houge Norway
Weiguang Mao United States
B. Ramanath Rao Netherlands
Roberta Mannucci Italy
Hargita Hegyesi Hungary
Yingting Zhu China
Stephen E. Mercer relative to Elena Rivera Argentina Elena Rivera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Elena Rivera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Mercer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Mercer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Mercer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Mercer. The network helps show where Stephen E. Mercer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Mercer Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Mercer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018201
2 2002194
3 2004116
4 2010113
5 2004104
6 200581
7 200668
8 200965
9 200461
10 202160
11 200657
12 200652
13 200645
14 201342
15 201641
16 200638
17 202236
18 197333
19 201232
20 201123

About Stephen E. Mercer

Stephen E. Mercer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Signaling Pathways in Disease (4 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (4 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (4 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (3 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (428 citations), Dermatology (137 citations), Molecular Biology (886 citations), Cell Biology (154 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (155 citations). Stephen E. Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eileen Friedman, Daina Z. Ewton, Xiaobing Deng, Robert Phelps, Valerie R. Yanofsky, Kideok Jin, Zhongfa Yan, Mark L. Burleson, Yonglong Zou and Richard E. Olson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of Cutaneous Pathology and American Journal of Dermatopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact