Stephen E. Long

50 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Stephen E. Long
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Analytical Chemistry 583
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 491
  • Electrochemistry 167
  • Spectroscopy 308
  • Pollution 207
Replace Michael Foulkes with:
Michael Foulkes United Kingdom
Owen T. Butler United Kingdom
Eduardo Bolea‐Fernandez Belgium
Karel Novotný Czechia
Ben Fairman United Kingdom
Mariella Moldován Spain
Tomáš Matoušek Czechia
Charles-Philippe Lienemann France
Juan Mora Spain
S. R. Koirtyohann United States
Stephen E. Long relative to Michael Foulkes United Kingdom Michael Foulkes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Foulkes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Long

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Long's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Long with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Long more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Long

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Long. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Long. The network helps show where Stephen E. Long may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Long, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Long Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Long links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011181
2 1988115
3 2012105
4 200159
5 200250
6 200247
7 198547
8 200444
9 201640
10 201239
11 199038
12 198636
13 198636
14
Method 200. 8 determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by inductively coupled plasma: Mass spectrometry. Revision 4. 3
199034
15 201133
16 199431
17 200330
18 200330
19 201728
20 201327

About Stephen E. Long

Stephen E. Long is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Spectroscopy, Pollution and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical chemistry methods development (32 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Heavy metals in environment (7 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (7 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (5 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (583 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (491 citations), Electrochemistry (167 citations), Spectroscopy (308 citations) and Pollution (207 citations). Stephen E. Long has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Richard F. Browner, William R. Kelly, Danielle Cleveland, Robert I. MacCuspie, Justin M. Zook, Steven J. Christopher, M. Rearick, Jacqueline L. Mann, Karen E. Murphy and William C. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Analytical Chemistry, Environmental Science & Technology and The Science of The Total Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact