Stephen E. Lewis

32 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • General Engineering 9
  • Signal Processing 87
  • Artificial Intelligence 211
  • Mechanics of Materials 150
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 119
Replace Brian O’Connor with:
Brian O’Connor Ireland
Yuan Liang China
Ming‐Hung Hsu Taiwan
Chang-Hee Choi South Korea
Ming Ma China
Sang-Woo Lee South Korea
Juanjuan Zhao China
Chenguang Zhu China
Ao Feng China
Stephen E. Lewis relative to Brian O’Connor Ireland Brian O’Connor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Brian O’Connor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Lewis. The network helps show where Stephen E. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Lewis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Lewis Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Lewis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005240
2 201363
3 201757
4 201244
5 201634
6 200823
7 201218
8 201215
9 201012
10 201311
11 197310
12 20098
13 19947
14
La guerra del "posh", 1951-1954: un conflicto decisivo entre el Instituto Nacional Indigenista, el monopolio del alcohol y el gobierno del estado de Chiapas
20047
15 20126
16 19976
17 20105
18 20235
19 20155
20 19944

About Stephen E. Lewis

Stephen E. Lewis is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Mechanical Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Mechanics of Materials and Demography, having authored 35 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (8 papers), Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education (7 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (5 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (3 papers), Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis (3 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (3 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (2 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Engineering (9 citations), Signal Processing (87 citations), Artificial Intelligence (211 citations), Mechanics of Materials (150 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (119 citations). Stephen E. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Steven J. Murdoch, Roger Lewis, Ulf Olofsson, David Fletcher, Jean-Luc Marion, Yi Zhu, Saeed Abbasi, Wenjian Wang, Tom Slatter and Eric Magel. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Latin American Perspectives, Wear, Radical History Review and Ethnohistory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact