Stephen E. Keith

41 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Speech and Hearing 638
  • Automotive Engineering 309
  • Sensory Systems 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 269
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 26
Replace Guoqing Di with:
Guoqing Di China
B Kruppa Austria
SA STANSFELD United Kingdom
Bridget Shield United Kingdom
Mark Matheson United Kingdom
Isabel López-Barrio Spain
Manolis Velonakis Greece
Wim Swart Netherlands
Christian Maschke Germany
M. Spreng Germany
Stephen E. Keith relative to Guoqing Di China Guoqing Di's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Guoqing Di · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Keith. The network helps show where Stephen E. Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Keith Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016132
2 201680
3 200860
4 201558
5 200554
6 201552
7 201646
8 200745
9 200839
10 201038
11 200336
12 201629
13 201622
14 201821
15 201317
16 200817
17 201116
18 201715
19 198814
20
Using a change in percent highly annoyed with noise as a potential health effect measure for projects under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
200812

About Stephen E. Keith

Stephen E. Keith is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Automotive Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 44 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (33 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (14 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (13 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (13 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (2 papers) and Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (638 citations), Automotive Engineering (309 citations), Sensory Systems (75 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (269 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (26 citations). Stephen E. Keith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include David S. Michaud, Katya Feder, Leonora Marro, Sonia A. Voicescu, Allison Denning, Frits van den Berg, Mireille Guay, Tara Bower, John Than and Éric Lavigne. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Noise and Health, SLEEP, International Journal of Radiation Biology and The International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact