Anke Marks

616 citations
15 papers · 500 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anke Marks

13 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Anke Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Speech and Hearing 323
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 55
  • Sensory Systems 11
  • General Decision Sciences 3
Replace Kenneth I. Hume with:
Kenneth I. Hume United Kingdom
Leena M. Rantala Finland
Alexander Samel Germany
Mingli Lu China
Barbara Kruppa Germany
Stephen E. Keith Canada
Mengyuan He China
Charles W. Nixon United States
Mercede Erfanian United Kingdom
Sofie Degeest Belgium
Anke Marks relative to Kenneth I. Hume United Kingdom Kenneth I. Hume's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Kenneth I. Hume · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anke Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Marks. The network helps show where Anke Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Anke Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anke Marks Line = papers co-authored together Anke Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2006155
2 2007116
3 2008108
4 200629
5 200725
6 200518
7 200816
8 200512
9 200810
10 20075
11 20082
12
Temporally limited nocturnal traffic curfews to prevent noise induced sleep disturbances
20082
13
Awakenings related to noises from various traffic modes
20061
14 20091
15 20090

About Anke Marks

Anke Marks is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Research and Theory and Pharmacy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (11 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Medical research and treatments (1 paper), Nursing care and research (1 paper) and Nursing education and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (323 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (55 citations), Sensory Systems (11 citations) and General Decision Sciences (3 citations). Anke Marks has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Griefahn, Sibylle Robens, Martin Schütte, Mathias Basner, Peter Bröde, Michael Falkenstein, Sergei A. Schapkin and Markus Breimhorst. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Noise and Health, Life Sciences, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Journal of Sound and Vibration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact