Stephen E. Gent

806 citations
18 papers · 445 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Gent

16 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Stephen E. Gent
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Development 90
  • Political Science and International Relations 233
  • Sociology and Political Science 360
  • Strategy and Management 37
  • Demography 24
Replace Patrick Köllner with:
Patrick Köllner Germany
Erik Martinez Kuhonta Canada
Christof Hartmann Germany
Kelly Kadera United States
Ben Tonra Ireland
Gerard Alexander United States
Peter VonDoepp United States
Andrea Kendall-Taylor United States
Minion K. C. Morrison United States
Sebastian Elischer United States
Stephen E. Gent relative to Patrick Köllner Germany Patrick Köllner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Patrick Köllner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Gent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Gent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Gent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Gent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Gent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Gent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Gent. The network helps show where Stephen E. Gent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Gent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Gent Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Gent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2012117
2 200877
3 200748
4 201046
5 201144
6 201536
7 201127
8 200920
9 20107
10 20135
11
The Politics of International Arbitration and Adjudication
20134
12 20193
13 20113
14 20213
15
It's Not Who but How: Third Parties and the Peaceful Settlement of Territorial Claims
20072
16
Reputation and NGO Accountability: An Application to International Mediators
20121
17 20191
18
Briefing Paper 4. GATS Mode 4: How Trade in Services Can Help Developing Countries.
20051

About Stephen E. Gent

Stephen E. Gent is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Development, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (12 papers), International Development and Aid (8 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (7 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (4 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (2 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (90 citations), Political Science and International Relations (233 citations), Sociology and Political Science (360 citations), Strategy and Management (37 citations) and Demography (24 citations). Stephen E. Gent has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Megan Shannon, Jacob D. Kathman, Reed M. Wood, Mark J.C. Crescenzi, Rob Williams and Ronald Skeldon. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, Conflict Management and Peace Science, International Interactions, International Theory and Journal of Conflict Resolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact