Stephen E. Abram

4.3k citations
137 papers · 3.4k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen E. Abram

129 papers receiving 3k citations

Peers

Stephen E. Abram
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1k
  • Physiology 945
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 414
  • Surgery 977
  • Pharmacology 306
Replace Jannick Brennum with:
Jannick Brennum Denmark
H. Alchaar France
Allen W. Burton United States
Timo Kauppila Finland
Jason E. Pope United States
Elliot S. Krames United States
J. N. Campbell United States
Leonardo Kapural United States
Kris C.P. Vissers Netherlands
Salim Michel Hayek United States
Stephen E. Abram relative to Jannick Brennum Denmark Jannick Brennum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Jannick Brennum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Abram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Abram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Abram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Abram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Abram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Abram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Abram. The network helps show where Stephen E. Abram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Abram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Abram Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Abram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 137 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008242
2 2001183
3 1997156
4 1994140
5 2006127
6 1991125
7 1996119
8 1994112
9 1993108
10 199481
11 199575
12 200474
13 199973
14 198070
15 200167
16 200063
17 199561
18 199356
19 199551
20 200951

About Stephen E. Abram

Stephen E. Abram is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 137 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (53 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (40 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (36 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (19 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (16 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (6 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1k citations), Physiology (945 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (414 citations), Surgery (977 citations) and Pharmacology (306 citations). Stephen E. Abram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Tony L. Yaksh, Quinn H. Hogan, Margaret B. Hopwood, Igor Kissin, Joseph H. Saiers, Cheryl L. Stucky, Martin Maršala, Geza Gemes, J. David Haddox and Andreas Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Pain and Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact