Stephen E. Abram

132 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Stephen E. Abram
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 783
  • Physiology 1.2k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 634
  • Pharmacology 529
  • Surgery 1.1k
Replace Gérard Mick with:
Gérard Mick France
Bernard Laurent France
Jun Sato Japan
Kenneth A. Follett United States
Y Lazorthes France
Salim M. Hayek United States
H. Alchaar France
Beth B. Murinson United States
Jan Van Zundert Belgium
Sergio Canavero Italy
Stephen E. Abram relative to Gérard Mick France Gérard Mick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Gérard Mick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Abram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Abram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Abram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Abram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Abram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Abram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Abram. The network helps show where Stephen E. Abram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Abram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen E. Abram Line = papers co-authored together Stephen E. Abram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008235
2 2001177
3 1997156
4 1994142
5 2006126
6 1991125
7 1996117
8 1994115
9 1993106
10 199480
11 199579
12 199976
13 198071
14 200064
15 199562
16 200456
17 199354
18 200951
19
Failure of naloxone to reverse analgesia from transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with chronic pain.
198150
20 200949

About Stephen E. Abram

Stephen E. Abram is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 143 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (44 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (38 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (29 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (27 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (21 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (14 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (9 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (783 citations), Physiology (1.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (634 citations), Pharmacology (529 citations) and Surgery (1.1k citations). Stephen E. Abram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Tony L. Yaksh, Quinn H. Hogan, Margaret Hopwood, J. David Haddox, Igor Kissin, Robert P. Anderson, Cheryl L. Stucky, Joseph H. Saiers, Martin Maršala and Geza Gemes. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Pain and Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact