Stephen Danczyk

1.3k citations
66 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Danczyk

62 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stephen Danczyk
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 143
  • Aerospace Engineering 407
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 132
  • Computational Mechanics 298
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 179
Replace A. Kuthi with:
A. Kuthi United States
C. Day Germany
P. R. Smy Canada
Scott I. Jackson United States
А. V. Avdeenkov Russia
R. M. Clements Canada
Mark Short United States
Waruna D. Kulatilaka United States
P. Agostini Italy
Theo Neger Austria
Stephen Danczyk relative to A. Kuthi United States A. Kuthi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
A. Kuthi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Danczyk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Danczyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Danczyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Danczyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Danczyk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Danczyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Danczyk. The network helps show where Stephen Danczyk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Danczyk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Danczyk Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Danczyk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009165
2 2012105
3 202078
4 201864
5 200848
6 199647
7 202043
8 202136
9 199930
10 202128
11 201226
12 199725
13 202023
14 201121
15 201919
16 200118
17 201917
18 199717
19 202015
20 199914

About Stephen Danczyk

Stephen Danczyk is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (21 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (21 papers), Combustion and Detonation Processes (17 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (16 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (14 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (9 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (143 citations), Aerospace Engineering (407 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (132 citations), Computational Mechanics (298 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (179 citations). Stephen Danczyk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include William A. Hargus, John W. Bennewitz, Blaine R. Bigler, Jabari Farrar, Scott Gilje, Stephen A. Schumaker, Richard B. Kaner, Sergey Dubin, Terrence R. Meyer and James R. Gord. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Propulsion and Power, Nuclear Physics A, Combustion and Flame, Applied Physics B and Advanced Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact