Stephen D. Pecot

1.6k citations
18 papers · 1.3k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen D. Pecot

18 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Stephen D. Pecot
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 732
  • Global and Planetary Change 785
  • Soil Science 328
  • Insect Science 190
  • Plant Science 423
Replace G. F. Weetman with:
G. F. Weetman Canada
J. Modrzyński Poland
Timothy B. Harrington United States
Shepard M. Zedaker United States
Sandra Patiño United Kingdom
Rongzhou Man Canada
Graeme D. Hope Canada
Xavier Cavard Canada
Bernard Prévosto France
Dale Worledge Australia
Stephen D. Pecot relative to G. F. Weetman Canada G. F. Weetman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
G. F. Weetman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Pecot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Pecot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Pecot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Pecot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Pecot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Pecot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Pecot. The network helps show where Stephen D. Pecot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. Pecot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. Pecot Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. Pecot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2005324
2 2001174
3 2005135
4 2003105
5 199987
6 200671
7 200761
8 200360
9 200358
10 200740
11 201539
12 200736
13 200533
14 200121
15 199917
16 200410
17
Silvicultural alternatives in a longleaf pine/wiregrass woodland in southwest Georgia: understory hardwood response to harvest-created gaps
200610
18
Using spatially variable overstory retention to restore structural and compositional complexity in pine ecosystems
20059

About Stephen D. Pecot

Stephen D. Pecot is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Plant Science and Insect Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (732 citations), Global and Planetary Change (785 citations), Soil Science (328 citations), Insect Science (190 citations) and Plant Science (423 citations). Stephen D. Pecot has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Mitchell, Joseph J. Hendricks, Carlos A Wilson, Ronald L. Hendrick, Dali Guo, Brian J. Palik, E. Barry Moser, Mike A. Battaglia, Craig W. Hedman and Dean H. Gjerstad. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, New Phytologist, Forest Science, Mycorrhiza and Ecological Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact