Robert J. Mitchell

8.3k citations
129 papers · 5.8k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Robert J. Mitchell

127 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

Robert J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.9k
  • Soil Science 1.2k
  • Ecology 1.4k
  • Plant Science 1.7k
Replace Neal A. Scott with:
Neal A. Scott United States
Jiří Doležal Czechia
Sarah J. Richardson New Zealand
Marco Moretti Switzerland
Margaret M. Moore United States
JB Kirkpatrick Australia
David J. Harris United States
Guillaume Decocq France
Wayne Walker United States
Jan Bogaert Belgium
Robert J. Mitchell relative to Neal A. Scott United States Neal A. Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Neal A. Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Mitchell. The network helps show where Robert J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Robert J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981359
2 2005324
3 2004277
4 1995204
5 2007179
6 2001174
7 2001170
8 2008167
9 2009148
10 2007143
11 2014138
12 2002115
13 2009108
14 2003105
15 201495
16 200994
17 199987
18 200282
19 201281
20 201279

About Robert J. Mitchell

Robert J. Mitchell is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 129 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (38 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (36 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (34 papers), Forest ecology and management (28 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (21 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (16 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (15 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.3k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.9k citations), Soil Science (1.2k citations), Ecology (1.4k citations) and Plant Science (1.7k citations). Robert J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph J. Hendricks, Stephen D. Pecot, Dali Guo, J. Kevin Hiers, Brian J. Palik, Joseph J. O’Brien, Roland A.H. van Oorschot, Carlos A Wilson, L. Katherine Kirkman and H. H. Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, New Phytologist, Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science and Journal of Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact