Stephen Crosier
Impact in
Papers in
- Genetics 13
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 13
-
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research 2
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism 2
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel S. Williamson (8 shared papers)Rebecca M. Hill (7 shared papers)Ed C. Schwalbe (8 shared papers)Debbie Hicks (8 shared papers)Steven C. Clifford (8 shared papers)Simon R. Bailey (8 shared papers)Janet C. Lindsey (7 shared papers)Abhijit R. Joshi (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuro-Oncology (6 papers)The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (2 papers)Acta Neuropathologica (2 papers)Cell Reports (2 papers)International Journal of Oncology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Crosier
25 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Stephen Crosier's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Genetics 777
- Neurology 257
- Cancer Research 231
- Molecular Biology 666
- Endocrinology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Crosier
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Crosier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Crosier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Crosier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Crosier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Crosier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Crosier. The network helps show where Stephen Crosier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Crosier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Novel molecular subgroups for clinical classification and outcome prediction in childhood medulloblastoma: a cohort study Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 411 |
| 2 | 2020 | 200 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 165 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 156 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 101 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 65 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 6 |
About Stephen Crosier
Stephen Crosier is a scholar working on Genetics, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Endocrinology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (4 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (777 citations), Neurology (257 citations), Cancer Research (231 citations), Molecular Biology (666 citations) and Endocrinology (33 citations). Stephen Crosier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Williamson, Rebecca M. Hill, Ed C. Schwalbe, Debbie Hicks, Steven C. Clifford, Simon R. Bailey, Janet C. Lindsey, Abhijit R. Joshi, Barry L. Pizer and Thomas S. Jacques. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, Acta Neuropathologica, Cell Reports and International Journal of Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.