Stephen Cox

1.2k citations
60 papers · 887 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Cox

47 papers receiving 772 citations

Peers

Stephen Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Applied Psychology 98
  • Sociology and Political Science 418
  • Urban Studies 52
  • Social Psychology 167
  • Information Systems and Management 48
Replace Aaron Tkaczynski with:
Aaron Tkaczynski Australia
Ryan J. Orr United States
Will Gibson United Kingdom
Anna Paola Ercolani Italy
Juliet Jain United Kingdom
Christine Horne United States
Stefan Rädiker Germany
Els Rommes Netherlands
Pete Lunn Ireland
Beth Ann Walker United States
Stephen Cox relative to Aaron Tkaczynski Australia Aaron Tkaczynski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Aaron Tkaczynski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Cox. The network helps show where Stephen Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Cox Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010208
2 1996138
3 2012106
4 201546
5 202231
6 201728
7 201825
8 202122
9 201322
10 201419
11 202119
12 202219
13 201918
14 201016
15 202015
16
"The stranger within thee" : concepts of the self in late-eighteenth-century literature
198014
17
Brisbane's Creative Industries 2003
200313
18 201112
19 201812
20 201411

About Stephen Cox

Stephen Cox is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Education, Urban Studies and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 60 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (7 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Mining and Resource Management (4 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Ayn Rand and Brontë studies (3 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (98 citations), Sociology and Political Science (418 citations), Urban Studies (52 citations), Social Psychology (167 citations) and Information Systems and Management (48 citations). Stephen Cox has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Katherine M. White, Rachel Parker, Cindy Gallois, Shari P. Walsh, Ross McD. Young, Kenneth I. Pakenham, Kyra Hamilton, Paul Thompson, Jan Henrik Gruenhagen and Alice Strazzabosco. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, American Literary History, Critical Review, Technology in Society and Journal of Child and Family Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact