Stephen Ching

834 citations
22 papers · 620 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Ching

21 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Stephen Ching
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • General Decision Sciences 78
  • Management Science and Operations Research 292
  • Economics and Econometrics 417
  • Bioengineering 38
  • Safety Research 52
Replace John Quah with:
John Quah United Kingdom
Miloš Kopa Czechia
Kyoungwon Seo South Korea
Lars Tyge Nielsen United States
Sanjay Srivastava United States
Martín Egozcue Uruguay
Wang Tan China
Jan Werner United States
Steinar Ekern Norway
Albert H. Choi United States
Stephen Ching relative to John Quah United Kingdom John Quah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John Quah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Ching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Ching's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Ching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Ching more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Ching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Ching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Ching. The network helps show where Stephen Ching may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Ching, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Ching Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Ching links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199495
2 200282
3 201176
4 200253
5 199247
6 200343
7 199643
8 199834
9 199733
10 199832
11 200320
12 202216
13 201213
14 20007
15
Strategy-Proofness and
19986
16 20005
17
The Contestability of the Urban Land Market: An Event Study of Hong Kong Land Auctions
20034
18 20014
19 20033
20
Maximal Domains for the Existence of Strategy-Proof Rules
19962

About Stephen Ching

Stephen Ching is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 22 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (11 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (11 papers), Economic theories and models (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (3 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (78 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (292 citations), Economics and Econometrics (417 citations), Bioengineering (38 citations) and Safety Research (52 citations). Stephen Ching has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lin Zhou, Yuming Fu, Shigehiro Serizawa, Glendon M. Zinser, Michael B. Devereux, Sébastien G. Gouin, Gamal Khalil, Colin D. Costin, Martin Gouterman and Martin Sadı́lek. Their work appears in journals such as Social Choice and Welfare, International Journal of Game Theory, Journal of Economic Theory, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry and Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact