Edwin L.‐C. Lai

41 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Edwin L.‐C. Lai
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 530
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 512
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.1k
  • Strategy and Management 305
  • Development 47
Replace Juan A. Máñez with:
Juan A. Máñez Spain
Nick Bloom United States
Rod Falvey United Kingdom
Rupert Harrison United Kingdom
Alessandro Sterlacchini Italy
Elena Golovko Netherlands
Katharine Wakelin United Kingdom
Susanne Prantl Germany
William C. Gruben United States
Marina Papanastassiou United Kingdom
Edwin L.‐C. Lai relative to Juan A. Máñez Spain Juan A. Máñez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Juan A. Máñez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin L.‐C. Lai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin L.‐C. Lai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin L.‐C. Lai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin L.‐C. Lai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin L.‐C. Lai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin L.‐C. Lai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin L.‐C. Lai. The network helps show where Edwin L.‐C. Lai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Edwin L.‐C. Lai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin L.‐C. Lai Line = papers co-authored together Edwin L.‐C. Lai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004320
2 1998293
3 2015119
4 2003107
5 2002101
6 199686
7 200867
8 199953
9 200541
10 201935
11 199525
12 200317
13 201916
14 201415
15 200215
16 201212
17 200111
18
Northern intellectual property rights standard for the south
19958
19 20128
20 20147

About Edwin L.‐C. Lai

Edwin L.‐C. Lai is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Finance, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (21 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (13 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (11 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (11 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (10 papers), International Business and FDI (8 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (7 papers) and Global Trade and Competitiveness (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (530 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (512 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.1k citations), Strategy and Management (305 citations) and Development (47 citations). Edwin L.‐C. Lai has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gene M. Grossman, Larry D. Qiu, Haichao Fan, Yum K. Kwan, Yao Amber Li, Andrew W. Horowitz, Raymond Riezman, Taiji Furusawa, Isabel K. Yan and Olena Ivus. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Economics, Journal of Comparative Economics, Economic Theory, Review of International Economics and Japan and the World Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact