Stephen Chapman

66 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Stephen Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 58
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 29
  • Gastroenterology 63
  • Soil Science 108
  • Family Practice 18
Replace Xiaoying Yu with:
Xiaoying Yu United States
Emilia Antonucci Italy
Nicoletta Erba Italy
A. N Phillips United Kingdom
Hong Xiao China
Hans Ury United States
Xin Liu China
Huixia Wang China
Robert Hayward United States
Paolo Frumento Italy
Stephen Chapman relative to Xiaoying Yu United States Xiaoying Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Xiaoying Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Chapman. The network helps show where Stephen Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996225
2 1981207
3 1998119
4
Standards for radiological investigations of suspected non-accidental injury
200865
5 202149
6 201248
7 199646
8 201742
9 201742
10 200339
11 201838
12 201338
13 200236
14 201836
15 201333
16 200125
17 201824
18 201724
19 202022
20 201722

About Stephen Chapman

Stephen Chapman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Immunology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (8 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (7 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (58 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (29 citations), Gastroenterology (63 citations), Soil Science (108 citations) and Family Practice (18 citations). Stephen Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include R Fitzpatrick, M. J. Swift, O. W. Heal, J. M. Anderson, Paul Emery, Elwyn Elias, Andrew Gough, Simon White, Martin Frischer and Peter Croft. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, JMIR Medical Education, Child s Nervous System, Current Medical Research and Opinion and British Journal of Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact