Stephen Carleton
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Fungal and yeast genetics research
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 4
- Congenital heart defects research 3
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 2
-
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 2
- Co-authors
- Richard P. Novick (6 shared papers)Steven J. Projan (4 shared papers)Toyoko Tsukuda (2 shared papers)Scott Fotheringham (2 shared papers)William K. Holloman (2 shared papers)S A Khan (3 shared papers)Sarah K. Highlander (3 shared papers)Gail K. Adler (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (4 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)The EMBO Journal (2 papers)Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Carleton
14 papers receiving 940 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Genetics 423
- Molecular Biology 845
- Infectious Diseases 151
- Molecular Medicine 41
- Plant Science 289
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Carleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Carleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Carleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Carleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Carleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Carleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Carleton. The network helps show where Stephen Carleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Carleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 262 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 260 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 96 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 75 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 74 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 63 | |
| 7 | 1982 | 62 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 54 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 32 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 22 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 10 |
About Stephen Carleton
Stephen Carleton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Congenital heart defects research (3 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (2 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (423 citations), Molecular Biology (845 citations), Infectious Diseases (151 citations), Molecular Medicine (41 citations) and Plant Science (289 citations). Stephen Carleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Novick, Steven J. Projan, Toyoko Tsukuda, Scott Fotheringham, William K. Holloman, S A Khan, Sarah K. Highlander, Gail K. Adler, S Iordănescu and Alexandra Gruss. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The EMBO Journal, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.