Stephen Carcieri
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 3
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 2
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 1
-
- Neurological disorders and treatments 6
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- Sheila Nirenberg (2 shared papers)Peter E. Latham (1 shared paper)Adam Jacobs (1 shared paper)Jens Volkmann (3 shared papers)Aristide Merola (2 shared papers)Srivatsan Pallavaram (2 shared papers)Leo Verhagen (2 shared papers)Brian Dalm (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Movement Disorders (1 paper)Neurology and Therapy (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Neurology (1 paper)Frontiers in Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyItaly
In The Last Decade
Stephen Carcieri
8 papers receiving 444 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Cognitive Neuroscience 258
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 238
- Neurology 121
- Neurology 24
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 35
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Carcieri
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Carcieri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Carcieri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Carcieri more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Carcieri
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Carcieri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Carcieri. The network helps show where Stephen Carcieri may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Carcieri, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 236 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 1 |
About Stephen Carcieri
Stephen Carcieri is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 9 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological disorders and treatments (6 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (258 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (238 citations), Neurology (121 citations), Neurology (24 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (35 citations). Stephen Carcieri has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Sheila Nirenberg, Peter E. Latham, Adam Jacobs, Jens Volkmann, Aristide Merola, Srivatsan Pallavaram, Leo Verhagen, Brian Dalm, Vibhor Krishna and Alberto Romagnolo. Their work appears in journals such as Movement Disorders, Neurology and Therapy, Nature, Neurology and Frontiers in Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.