Stephen C. Pollock

23 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

Stephen C. Pollock
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Ophthalmology 202
  • Clinical Biochemistry 63
  • Neurology 120
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 118
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 118
Replace Sabine Defoort with:
Sabine Defoort France
Jinu Han South Korea
Brian N. Bachynski United States
Victor Godel Israel
Sueng‐Han Han South Korea
Daniel J. Salchow Germany
CHRISTINE T. LANGERHORST Netherlands
Richard L. Sogg United States
Nel T. Tijmes Netherlands
Tobias Stupp Germany
Stephen C. Pollock relative to Sabine Defoort France Sabine Defoort's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Sabine Defoort · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Pollock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Pollock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Pollock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Pollock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Pollock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Pollock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Pollock. The network helps show where Stephen C. Pollock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Pollock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Pollock Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Pollock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987106
2 199598
3 199675
4 200164
5 198955
6 198151
7 199339
8 199436
9 198628
10 199522
11 199820
12 198619
13 199112
14 198810
15 19968
16 19878
17 20208
18 19904
19 19934
20 19873

About Stephen C. Pollock

Stephen C. Pollock is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (2 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (202 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (63 citations), Neurology (120 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (118 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (118 citations). Stephen C. Pollock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Neil R. Miller, Edward G. Buckley, Michael C. Brodsky, Brian S. Kendall, Karim F. Damji, David Lee Epstein, Kent W. Small, Margaret A Pericak‐Vance, Linda M. Tsai and Lee Jampol. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Retina, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Documenta Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact