Stephen C. Mitchell

42 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Stephen C. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pharmacology 213
  • Clinical Biochemistry 69
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 11
  • Biochemistry 19
  • Sensory Systems 12
Replace Elardus Erasmus with:
Elardus Erasmus South Africa
Shinji Ohmori Japan
Konrad Lang Germany
John R. Cashman United States
Alan A. Brimfield United States
José Barril Spain
M. Wilson Tabor United States
Richard J. Nolan United States
Siegfried Hollmann Germany
CHARLES GLEN KING United States
Stephen C. Mitchell relative to Elardus Erasmus South Africa Elardus Erasmus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Elardus Erasmus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Mitchell. The network helps show where Stephen C. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198796
2 200160
3 198750
4 201245
5 198839
6 201331
7 198727
8 199520
9 201919
10 200814
11 200814
12 201514
13 201611
14 20099
15 20219
16 20098
17 19967
18 20187
19 20046
20 20066

About Stephen C. Mitchell

Stephen C. Mitchell is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 42 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (30 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (4 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (2 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (213 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (69 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (11 citations), Biochemistry (19 citations) and Sensory Systems (12 citations). Stephen C. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Smith, Riad Ayesh, Makram M. Al-Waiz, Jeffrey R. Idle, Glyn B. Steventon, Rosemary H. Waring, Elaine C. Holmes, William M. B. Edmands, Nigel J. Gooderham and Ben Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as Xenobiotica, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Biochemical Society Transactions, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact