Stephen C. Light
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Health disparities and outcomes
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Papers in
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 4
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 2
- Torture, Ethics, and Law 1
- Workplace Violence and Bullying 1
- Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment 1
-
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 1
- Co-authors
- Nan Lin (1 shared paper)Judith R. Blau (1 shared paper)Mitchell B. Chamlin (1 shared paper)Dilip K. Das (1 shared paper)Arvind Verma (1 shared paper)James M. Edie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Justice Quarterly (2 papers)Noûs (1 paper)Work and Occupations (1 paper)SubStance (1 paper)Social Forces (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen C. Light
10 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Health 85
- Sociology and Political Science 267
- Clinical Psychology 129
- General Health Professions 105
- Social Psychology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Light
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Light's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Light with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Light more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Light
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Light. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Light. The network helps show where Stephen C. Light may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Light, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 181 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 63 | |
| 3 | Measurement Error in Official Statistics: Prison Rule Infraction Data | 1990 | 60 |
| 4 | 1995 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 31 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 9 | Understanding Criminal Justice | 1998 | 2 |
| 10 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 0 |
About Stephen C. Light
Stephen C. Light is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper), Workplace Violence and Bullying (1 paper), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (85 citations), Sociology and Political Science (267 citations), Clinical Psychology (129 citations), General Health Professions (105 citations) and Social Psychology (56 citations). Stephen C. Light has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nan Lin, Judith R. Blau, Mitchell B. Chamlin, Dilip K. Das, Arvind Verma and James M. Edie. Their work appears in journals such as Justice Quarterly, Noûs, Work and Occupations, SubStance and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.