Stephen Brooke

791 citations
35 papers · 349 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Brooke

32 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Stephen Brooke
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • History 144
  • Political Science and International Relations 144
  • Sociology and Political Science 169
  • Gender Studies 25
  • Space and Planetary Science 3
Replace A. L. Beier with:
A. L. Beier Ghana
Trevor Lloyd Canada
Julius R. Ruff United States
Joan M. Jensen United States
Steve Hindle United Kingdom
J. S. Cockburn United States
Jonathan Barry United Kingdom
Tanya Evans Australia
Sally Alexander United Kingdom
Douglas Pike United States
Stephen Brooke relative to A. L. Beier Ghana A. L. Beier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
A. L. Beier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Brooke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Brooke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Brooke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Brooke. The network helps show where Stephen Brooke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Brooke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Brooke Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Brooke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199735
2 199231
3 200130
4 201129
5 201728
6 201422
7 199318
8 200117
9 199116
10 199716
11 201412
12 198911
13 201611
14 19949
15 19969
16 20058
17 19917
18 19716
19 20065
20 20125

About Stephen Brooke

Stephen Brooke is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Economics and Econometrics and Oceanography, having authored 35 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (14 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (13 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (8 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers) and Children's Rights and Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (144 citations), Political Science and International Relations (144 citations), Sociology and Political Science (169 citations), Gender Studies (25 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (3 citations). Stephen Brooke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Nick Tiratsoo, John Saville, Steven Fielding, Amy Black, Jennifer P. McClain‐Counts, Furu Mienis, Catherine Ann Cline, Kathryn McPherson and Ian Bullock. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Twentieth Century British History, Journal of British Studies, Women s History Review and Journal of Social History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact