Stephen Blum
Impact in
- Music top 1%
- Music History and Culture
- Diverse Musicological Studies
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Diverse Music Education Insights
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
Papers in
- Music 17
- Diverse Musicological Studies 13
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 12
- Music History and Culture 7
-
- Islamic Studies and History 4
- Turkey's Politics and Society 2
- Co-authors
- Bruno Nettl (5 shared papers)Philip V. Bohlman (4 shared papers)Amnon Shiloah (2 shared papers)Daniel M. Neuman (3 shared papers)Veit Erlmann (1 shared paper)David R. Henderson (1 shared paper)Margaret J. Kartomi (1 shared paper)Amir Hassanpour (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ethnomusicology (6 papers)Notes (5 papers)Yearbook for Traditional Music (3 papers)Asian Music (2 papers)Journal of Music Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Stephen Blum
22 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Music 120
- Developmental Biology 9
- Cultural Studies 26
- Anthropology 25
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Blum
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Blum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Blum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Blum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Blum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Blum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Blum. The network helps show where Stephen Blum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Blum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 55 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 38 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 25 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 1 |
About Stephen Blum
Stephen Blum is a scholar working on Music, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Education, having authored 29 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Musicological Studies (13 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (12 papers), Music History and Culture (7 papers), Islamic Studies and History (4 papers), Turkey's Politics and Society (2 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (1 paper) and Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (120 citations), Developmental Biology (9 citations), Cultural Studies (26 citations), Anthropology (25 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations). Stephen Blum has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Nettl, Philip V. Bohlman, Amnon Shiloah, Daniel M. Neuman, Veit Erlmann, David R. Henderson, Margaret J. Kartomi, Amir Hassanpour, Alan P. Merriam and Bonnie C. Wade. Their work appears in journals such as Ethnomusicology, Notes, Yearbook for Traditional Music, Asian Music and Journal of Music Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.