Stephen Bamforth
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Williams Syndrome Research
-
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Genomics and Rare Diseases
Papers in
-
- Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors 1
-
- Historical and Literary Analyses 2
- Co-authors
- Eul‐Ju Seo (1 shared paper)Carolyn Β. Mervis (1 shared paper)Luis A. Pérez‐Jurado (1 shared paper)Lucy R. Osborne (1 shared paper)Martin J. Somerville (1 shared paper)Miguel Del Campo (1 shared paper)Colleen A. Morris (1 shared paper)Margaret Lilley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (4 papers)Renaissance Studies (3 papers)French Studies (1 paper)New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)Nottingham French Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Bamforth
13 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Developmental Neuroscience 87
- Genetics 145
- Developmental Biology 5
- Molecular Biology 115
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 29
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Bamforth
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Bamforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Bamforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Bamforth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Bamforth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Bamforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Bamforth. The network helps show where Stephen Bamforth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Bamforth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 224 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 22 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 0 |
About Stephen Bamforth
Stephen Bamforth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval European Literature and History (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (1 paper), Bone and Joint Diseases (1 paper), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Renaissance Literature and Culture (1 paper) and Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (87 citations), Genetics (145 citations), Developmental Biology (5 citations), Molecular Biology (115 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (29 citations). Stephen Bamforth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eul‐Ju Seo, Carolyn Β. Mervis, Luis A. Pérez‐Jurado, Lucy R. Osborne, Martin J. Somerville, Miguel Del Campo, Colleen A. Morris, Margaret Lilley, Stephen W. Scherer and Edwin J. Young. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Renaissance Studies, French Studies, New England Journal of Medicine and Nottingham French Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.