Stephen Bales

701 citations
31 papers · 482 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Bales

28 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers

Stephen Bales
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Library and Information Sciences 70
  • Polymers and Plastics 98
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 44
  • Organic Chemistry 138
  • Information Systems and Management 28
Replace Chuanfu Chen with:
Chuanfu Chen China
Robert Tomaszewski United States
Steve O’Connor Australia
Elizabeth Brown United States
MICHAEL HEYLIN
Thomas C. Wright United States
Ross Harvey Australia
Prateeti Chakraborty India
Sandeep Kaur‐Ghumaan India
Stephen Bales relative to Chuanfu Chen China Chuanfu Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Chuanfu Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Bales

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Bales's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Bales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Bales more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Bales

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Bales. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Bales. The network helps show where Stephen Bales may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Bales, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Bales Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Bales links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974135
2 198461
3 201851
4 201034
5 201230
6 197328
7 200325
8 201413
9 198811
10 201911
11 200510
12 20128
13 19988
14
The Dialectic of Academic Librarianship: A Critical Approach
20158
15 19977
16 20046
17 19746
18 20115
19 19724
20 20204

About Stephen Bales

Stephen Bales is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Organic Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics, Information Systems and Spectroscopy, having authored 31 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (7 papers), Library Science and Administration (6 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers), Synthesis and properties of polymers (4 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (3 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (3 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (70 citations), Polymers and Plastics (98 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (44 citations), Organic Chemistry (138 citations) and Information Systems and Management (28 citations). Stephen Bales has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Reuben D. Rieke, Robert A. Bubeck, Hyomin Lee, Peiling Wang, Maurice J. Marks, Dennis W. Smith, Robert Gulotty, M. Inbasekaran, Patrick B. Smith and Sundaram Suresh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Macromolecules and College & Research Libraries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact