Stephen A. Johnson

126 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Stephen A. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Developmental Neuroscience 406
  • Genetics 899
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 197
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 698
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 214
Replace Robert C. Robbins with:
Robert C. Robbins United States
Peter A. Whittaker United States
Ralph Alexander Schmid Switzerland
Willem J Flameng Belgium
E. René Rodríguez United States
Tao‐Sheng Li Japan
Yawara Eguchi Japan
Kirk L. Peterson United States
Jahar Bhattacharya United States
J. A. Richter Germany
Stephen A. Johnson relative to Robert C. Robbins United States Robert C. Robbins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Robert C. Robbins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen A. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen A. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen A. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen A. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen A. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen A. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen A. Johnson. The network helps show where Stephen A. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen A. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen A. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Stephen A. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 127 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008144
2 1999142
3 1975138
4 2009125
5 2004112
6 1992100
7 200694
8 196893
9 200590
10 202188
11 201782
12 200777
13 199674
14 202272
15 200770
16 200269
17 201968
18 200468
19 199568
20 200067

About Stephen A. Johnson

Stephen A. Johnson is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Hematology and Oncology, having authored 127 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (34 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (26 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (12 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (9 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (9 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (8 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (7 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (406 citations), Genetics (899 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (197 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (698 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (214 citations). Stephen A. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include John W. Olney, Chainllie Young, David Graham Oscier, Roger G. Owen, Constance Senior, Francis A Duck, Catherine E. Creeley, Martin John Milner, James F. Greenleaf and Daniel Catovsky. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Haematology, Journal of neurosurgery, Hematological Oncology, Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact