Stephanie Meier

469 citations
35 papers · 317 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephanie Meier

33 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Stephanie Meier
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Human-Computer Interaction 29
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 114
  • Reproductive Medicine 25
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 18
  • Gender Studies 20
Replace Bernadette McCreight with:
Bernadette McCreight United Kingdom
Aileen Wyllie Australia
Catherine Angell United Kingdom
Robin Hadley United Kingdom
Raquel Bosó Pérez United Kingdom
Bonnie Schmidt United States
Meridith Burles Canada
Karin Forslund Frykedal Sweden
Anne Wong Canada
Siobhán Smyth Ireland
Stephanie Meier relative to Bernadette McCreight United Kingdom Bernadette McCreight's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Bernadette McCreight · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Meier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Meier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Meier. The network helps show where Stephanie Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie Meier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephanie Meier Line = papers co-authored together Stephanie Meier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201934
2 201930
3 201225
4 201925
5 201924
6 201917
7 201016
8 201915
9 201914
10 201412
11 201511
12 202010
13 201610
14 20209
15 20209
16 20206
17 20206
18 20235
19 20085
20 20204

About Stephanie Meier

Stephanie Meier is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Reproductive Medicine, Sociology and Political Science and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (29 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (114 citations), Reproductive Medicine (25 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (18 citations) and Gender Studies (20 citations). Stephanie Meier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrea L. DeMaria, Beth Sundstrom, Deborah L. Billings, Merissa Ferrara, Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, William Odom, Laura M. Schwab‐Reese, Annabel Jones and Heike Eschenbeck. Their work appears in journals such as The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, BMC Women s Health, Culture Health & Sexuality, Journal of Consumer Behaviour and Body Image.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact