Stephan Kelm

1.1k citations
65 papers · 743 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Stephan Kelm

58 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers

Stephan Kelm
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Aerospace Engineering 550
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 123
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 88
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 113
  • Computational Mechanics 229
Replace Ahmed Bentaïb with:
Ahmed Bentaïb France
S. E. Yakush Russia
N. Meynet France
Kannan N. Iyer India
Michele Andreani Switzerland
Karl Verfondern Germany
A. Kotchourko Germany
I. Wierzba Canada
V. S. Babkin Russia
Stephan Kelm relative to Ahmed Bentaïb France Ahmed Bentaïb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ahmed Bentaïb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Kelm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Kelm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Kelm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Kelm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Kelm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Kelm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Kelm. The network helps show where Stephan Kelm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephan Kelm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephan Kelm Line = papers co-authored together Stephan Kelm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200961
2 201344
3 201940
4 202139
5 201233
6 201633
7 201831
8 201928
9 202127
10 201427
11 202127
12 201625
13 201523
14 201218
15 201718
16 201617
17 201917
18 200816
19 201815
20 201814

About Stephan Kelm

Stephan Kelm is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 65 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (35 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (16 papers), Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (16 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (15 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (11 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (8 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (7 papers) and Combustion and flame dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (550 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (123 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (88 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (113 citations) and Computational Mechanics (229 citations). Stephan Kelm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and India. Frequent co-authors include Hans-Josef Allelein, Ernst-Arndt Reinecke, Ahmed Bentaïb, N. Meynet, Ralf Kapulla, K. Arul Prakash, B. V. S. S. S. Prasad, B. S. V. Patnaik, Karl Verfondern and A. Dehbi. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Engineering and Design, Annals of Nuclear Energy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Applied Thermal Engineering and Nuclear Engineering and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact