Stephan Brecht

2.3k citations
39 papers · 2.0k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Stephan Brecht

39 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Stephan Brecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Neurology 309
  • Developmental Neuroscience 150
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 693
  • Biological Psychiatry 42
  • Molecular Biology 899
Replace Ada Maria Tata with:
Ada Maria Tata Italy
Virginia L. Smith‐Swintosky United States
Kenneth I. Strauss United States
Sabino Vesce United States
M. Walton New Zealand
Tong‐Chun Wen Japan
David Virley United Kingdom
Marianna Storto Italy
B. Joy Snider United States
Elżbieta Salińska Poland
Stephan Brecht relative to Ada Maria Tata Italy Ada Maria Tata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ada Maria Tata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan Brecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan Brecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan Brecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan Brecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan Brecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan Brecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan Brecht. The network helps show where Stephan Brecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephan Brecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephan Brecht Line = papers co-authored together Stephan Brecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005264
2 2005196
3 2002168
4 1993163
5 2003142
6 2003127
7 1999110
8 200497
9 200377
10 200775
11 201265
12 200255
13 200153
14 200645
15 199843
16 200335
17 200932
18 199531
19 199728
20 199427

About Stephan Brecht

Stephan Brecht is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Immunology and Neurology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (5 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers) and Signaling Pathways in Disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (309 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (150 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (693 citations), Biological Psychiatry (42 citations) and Molecular Biology (899 citations). Stephan Brecht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Herdegen, Kirsten Mielke, Vicki Waetzig, Michael J. Courtney, Vesa Hongisto, Eleanor T. Coffey, M. Zimmermann, Mario E. Goetz, Ute Hidding and Uwe‐Karsten Hanisch. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, European Journal of Neuroscience, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Journal of Neuroscience and Stroke.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact