Sten Widmalm

556 citations
43 papers · 327 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Sten Widmalm

33 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Sten Widmalm
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Public Administration 26
  • Political Science and International Relations 146
  • Development 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 174
  • Communication 20
Replace Max J. Skidmore with:
Max J. Skidmore United States
John Ehrenberg United States
Wolfgang Muño Germany
Stephen L. Esquith United States
Sean Chabot United States
Richard Sobel France
John Meadowcroft United Kingdom
Sean Yom United States
Yunshik Chang Canada
Peter Morriss Ireland
Sten Widmalm relative to Max J. Skidmore United States Max J. Skidmore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Max J. Skidmore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Widmalm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Widmalm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Widmalm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Widmalm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Widmalm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Widmalm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Widmalm. The network helps show where Sten Widmalm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Sten Widmalm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Widmalm Line = papers co-authored together Sten Widmalm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200841
2 201630
3
Kashmir in Comparative Perspective: Democracy and Violent Separatism in India
200227
4 201823
5 202123
6 200518
7 200818
8
Det hotade universitetet
201618
9 201914
10 199714
11 200510
12 201910
13 20149
14 20059
15 20237
16 20167
17 20136
18 20196
19 19975
20
After NPM, curb your enthusiasm over the Principal Agent Theory
20163

About Sten Widmalm

Sten Widmalm is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Economics and Econometrics and Philosophy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (8 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (5 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (4 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (4 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (26 citations), Political Science and International Relations (146 citations), Development (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (174 citations) and Communication (20 citations). Sten Widmalm has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Persson, Charles F. Parker, Sven Oskarsson, Karl‐Oskar Lindgren, Christer Karlsson, Jörgen Hermansson, Anna Jarstad, Staffan I. Lindberg and Sandra Grahn. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, European Security, Public Administration, Forum for Development Studies and Journal of European Public Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact